Skip to content

Really?

April 8, 2009
by

Steven Novella at NeuroLogica has a fantastic top to bottom overview of arguing. I have recently given some thought to the tension between ceding some reasonable points to the opposition versus portraying the other side as off-the-wall batshit crazy. For example, it may be an effective strategy to say, “I understand where you’re coming from; reasonable people can disagree over X, but I see it this way…” Sometimes, it’s impossible to be so conciliatory. Certain arguments demand that the opposition be characterized as totally fucking looney tunes.


It is necessary for religious zealots to adopt that “damn the torpedoes, full steam ahead!” approach in several culture war issues, including evolution. The ministry responsible for the Creation Museum cannot admit that the theory of evolution arose from reasonable interpretations of fossil and genetic evidence when the supposedly inerrant Bible describes the origin of life in starkly different terms. To
them, the 65-million-year gulf between dinosaur extinction and human emergence must be collapsed so as to conform with the 6,000-year history of the biblical universe. Slap a saddle on a triceratops and you’re good to go. Whatever you do, don’t admit that there’s anything to “Darwinism”.

Here’s another one: the Family Research Council says that today’s decision by the Vermont legislature to implement gay marriage is part of “a movement driven by wealthy homosexual activists and a liberal elite determined to destroy not only the institution of marriage, but democracy as well.” It’s not enough to say, “we believe that homosexuality is unethical and ought not to be sanctioned by the state.” Instead, they resort to frothy-mouthed rants about how the supporters of gay marriage are “determined to destroy democracy.”


What the living fuck does that even mean? Determined to destroy democracy? That’s not an allegation I can even respond to on its merits. It’s conclusory and unsupported. What would advocates of gay marriage replace democracy with? As an ardent supporter of both gay marriage and our republican democracy, I insist that the Family Research Council’s statement is untenable at best. It’s not even good argumentum ad hominem . If you want to go after the gay rights crowd, declare that they want public schools to teach your sons how to suck dick.

The zealots will lose. When they must resort to batshit fucking insane looney tunes arguments like “advocates for gay marriage hate democracy”, it’s evident that their movement is failing. Praise the Lord!
Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. David permalink
    April 8, 2009 6:55 pm

    “Damn the torpedoes!” = “Forget the keys!”

    -DeeJay

Trackbacks

  1. The Creation Museum « Is It Luck?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: